Skip to content

Full-stack, one team

Nominal

ARGV

Consulting

Time-boxed advisory

Technical Consulting

Engineers in the room

Straight answers from people who have built, broken, and repaired systems — no account managers, no slideware.

Technical Consulting

ARGV icon

Scope

Principal advisory

Duration

1 – 6 weeks

Deliverable

Technical report

Ownership

100% Client IP

ReviewDue DiligenceArchitectureRescue

Where the advice lands

The decisions that benefit most from an outside engineer — made under time pressure, with money on the line, or after something has already gone wrong.

Architecture review

A structured read of the system's design against its constraints, with the risks ranked by consequence.

Technical due diligence

An honest assessment of code, architecture, and team before investment, acquisition, or major commitment.

Rescue & recovery

Failing projects assessed, stabilized, and brought to a stable end state — with the plan laid out in writing.

Team and process advice

Engineering organization, tooling, and delivery practice reviewed against the size of the work.

The design read against its constraints

A structured pass with findings you can act on.

Constraint check

The design tested against requirements, budget, and reality.

Findings ranked

Issues ordered by consequence with remediation paths.

Follow-up

Recommendations tracked until closed or consciously declined.

The honest technical picture

Evidence gathered before the decision, not after.

Evidence gathering

Code, configuration, and architecture sampled systematically.

Risk assessment

Technical debt and red flags quantified, not just listed.

Decision report

A written assessment that names what is sound and what is not.

An engineer on call for decisions

Ongoing access to judgment that has built systems.

Decision support

Technical calls reviewed before they are committed.

Standing reviews

Architecture and delivery checked on a cadence.

Early warnings

Problems surfaced while they are still cheap to fix.

Choices made on evidence

Candidates compared against the problem, not the brochure.

Evaluation criteria

Fit, cost, and risk weighted before comparison starts.

Working trials

Short proofs that test the candidates under real conditions.

Verdict

A recommendation with the reasoning and trade-offs written down.

A plan with dependencies made visible

The next moves sequenced against the system's real state.

Current state

Where the system is, established from evidence.

Sequencing

Work ordered by dependency and risk, not preference.

Milestones

Checkpoints with owners and measurable outcomes.

The shape of a consulting engagement

Built to give you an answer quickly — and to keep the door open when the answer needs building.

Time-boxed by design

Engagements run on a fixed calendar and a fixed price, with scope carved to fit.

Engineers, not slides

The people doing the work deliver the findings — you talk to the ones who read the code.

Written outcomes

Every engagement closes with a written deliverable you can act on, share, and keep.

Optional follow-through

If you want the recommendations implemented, the consulting team can hand the work to the engineering lines.